Virtually every decision to produce, buy or sell is influenced by quality, yet my books and papers are among the very few producing theory that applies to real products in real markets.
Bowbrick, P., 2014 ‘The Economics of Quality, Grades and Brands’, Routledge, A complete, coherent, formal, economic approach covering the closely linked aspects of quality, grades and brands. It applies to real products in real markets. It refutes most of the dominant theory of the time. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 2012. ‘From Economic Research to Policy in 32 Years.’ Eurochoices,11 3 44-47. How civil servants wasted hundreds of billions by ignoring and suppressing my generally accepted economic analysis of EU Fruit and Vegetable regulations. And how they adopted it eventually, making a revolutionary change in the law. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1996. ‘Quality theories in agricultural economics’ [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1996. ‘Why economic-man theories of quality are wrong’. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1995. The conceptual basis of quality in marketing. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1995. Refuting groups of theories. Refutating a paper takes skill. The next step is refuting a research programme or refuting the theory that a wrong paper uses. Researchers defend their research programme or theory by saying that refutations of some theories do not apply to them because they use slightly different assumptions, so this paper covers refuting groups of theories which use different sets of assumptions. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1994. Limitations of Lancaster’s theory of Consumer Demand, PhD Thesis, Henley Management College. A formal refutation of the most cited work on quality, which was written by one of the eleven most cited economists. The refutation covers a wide range of logical errors, and methodological weaknesses. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1994. ‘Limitations of non-behavioural approaches to the economics of quality’ Conference of International Association for Research on Economic Psychology and the Society for the Advancement of Behavioural Economics, Rotterdam. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1994 ‘A Refutation of Characteristics Theories of Quality’ 214pp. A complete, formal, refutation of the dominant theories, showing they have no practical application. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1994 ‘A critique of economic man theories of quality’ [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1992 ‘The Economics of Quality, Grades and Brands’, Routledge, London. A complete, coherent, formal, economic approach covering the closely linked aspects of quality, grades and brands. It applies to real products in real markets. It refutes most of the dominant theory of the time. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1990. ‘Justifications for compulsory minimum standards’ British Food Journal, 92 2 23-30. This shows that compulsory minimum standards are justified in certain circumstances, and indeed that some markets cannot exist without them. These special conditions do not exist in most markets. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1983 ‘Stars and Superstars’, American Economic Review. June. p459 vol 73. When some people avoid a characteristic or ingredient, the seller loses more than just their custom. There is a multiplier effect. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1982 ‘The Economics of Grades’, Oxford Agrarian Studies. 11, 65-92. 1982. Complete formal system. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1981. ‘An Economic Appraisal of the EEC Fruit and Vegetable Grading System’. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.3424.9762 ed. Dublin: An Foras Taluntais. This book gives a detailed, rigorous, economic analysis of the EEC fruit and vegetable grading system and its component legislation. It cost farmers and consumers hundreds of billions over the years, but there was no evidence of benefits. Eventually the EU accepted this analysis and abolished the system. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1980, ‘Pseudo-research in marketing – the case of the price:perceived quality relationship’, European Journal of Marketing. 14 8 466-70. Destroys a large and long-lived academic approach to research, in marketing, human relations, psychology etc. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1979 ‘Evaluating a grading system’, Irish Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology. 117-126. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1977, ‘The case against compulsory minimum standards’, Journal of Agricultural Economics. 28: 113-117, May. This led eventually to the abolition of the EU fruit and vegetable grading standards. [PDF]
Bowbrick, P., 1976. ‘Compulsory grading and the consumer’, Acta Horticulturae. 55.