I sued my internet provider

Peter Bowbrick

HOME PAGE

EXPERIENCE

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS

PUBLICATIONS BY PETER BOWBRICK
 

Quality Grades and Brands


The Art of the Economist
 

Marketing Economics
 

Famines


Academic Fraud

Profitable Consultancy Techniques

Sue your internet provider - and win


CONTACT PETER BOWBRICK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPERIENCE

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS

PUBLICATIONS BY PETER BOWBRICK
 

Quality Grades and Brands


The Art of the Economist
 

Marketing Economics
 

Famines


Academic Fraud

 

Site map

CONTACT PETER BOWBRICK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOME

 

 

 

EXPERIENCE

ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS

PUBLICATIONS BY PETER BOWBRICK
 

Quality Grades and Brands


The Art of the Economist
 

Marketing Economics
 

Famines


Academic Fraud

CONTACT PETER BOWBRICK

HOME

 

I sued my internet provider, Virgin Media, in the small claims court and won £1000 – and it cost them perhaps £1000 in lawyers’ fees. If everybody who is messed about by their provider does the same, they will improve their service dramatically. 500 complainants would cost them £1 million.

They cut off my service and refused to do anything for ten days. Eventually they reinstated my e-mail. They cut off my web site and refused to do anything about it. Still haven't.

 One advantage of the small claims court is that you do not have to have a lawyer, and incur large costs. Another is that you do not have to bear the other side’s costs if you lose. This means that if you lose, you will be £80 out of pocket; they will be £1000+ out of pocket. If you win, much more.

Do it for pleasure. Do not expect to win. Do not expect justice. Just know that, even if you lose, it will cost them £1000+. And remember that the judge has also been messed around by internet service providers.

Your contract should say that they will provide you with services. This is the crunch point. They will try to laugh it away, but keep insisting. The judge will support you. He also uses the internet.

 They will try to argue that if you sometimes do business on your e-mail or your internet it is a commercial web site and you are not covered. Nonsense: everybody buys and many people sell on the internet. So you send some business letters by e-mail? So does the judge. The judge is a lawyer, who is, that day only, acting as a judge. His e-mail and web site are what any self employed person has.

They will try to argue that if your web site mentions your professional skills or qualifications it is a commercial web site. Again, think what the judge has on his web site advertising his legal business. To me, and probably to the judge, a commercial web site is one where you can buy or sell on line.

This means that you must not claim loss of business from your web site or e-mail as the cost. The cost must be the time you spent sitting on a phone for hours waiting for someone to answer. The cost must be the time you spent trying to get your web site to work again. That is to say, you wasted time because of their breach of contract. The time is valued at your professional fee rate.

Do not talk to the lawyers before or after the case. They will try to psych you into dropping the case.

The procedure is very simple, straightforward and cheap. For details see below.

 The different UK systems are covered in

 

Small Claims advice guide

Documents are available at Small Claims Documents

For England see http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/claims/index.htm

For Scotland see www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si1988/Uksi_19881999_en_1.htm

Dr Peter Bowbrick  

Peter@Bowbrick.eu  0131 556 7292     0777 274 6759